And that post has made you the winner David. Well done. I'm off to visit my other half now... so if you don't mind waiting for my return... I will reveal what would have have won (I liked it so I italised it) if we hadn't reached the last three seconds of the potato's countdown to being the first vegetable in space... and I too will comment on all the posts sandwiched between yours and my previous one :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
If what I was looking for WAS onions :) then yes, I would have been very pleased to declare Mikey the winner :) however... you won by virtue of being post number 321, David - which is why I said:
Quote:
...the last three seconds of the potato's countdown to being the first vegetable in space
If it had been pints of Guinness, or indeed pokers, robl would have won, which would have pleased me too :)
And it would have been exceedingly interesting to determine who might have won if it had been garlic. Mike, or Gary? Or the black death versus marshmallows and mulled ale :))) but it wasn't. It was you! :) That was a particularly delectable looking dish you posted earlier by the way. Of course, with your onerous duties requiring you to lord about TLPTP'ers at Seti, perhaps you would like to hand the crown over to someone else? :)
Whilst you mull that over...
If you cut AB at C with C, where would you put A? In the bin? (I went for a composting one here people - to be green - but its historical accuracy is extremely dubious as Elizabethans threw all their rubbish in the streets) Or in the pot?
Now... can anyone deduce what might have been the missing vegetable?* :) And what may have happened next? I haven't got my last picture quite ready yet... but hopefully I'll get it in before the edit window closes, or afterwards... to confirm anyone's too too late correct answer...
Quote:
Hope you have good news Annie.
Thanks Chris :) I think I may need to find a suitable name for his beard :) He's never had one before and it is well...!!!! :)))))))
*and before anybody says anything... IT'S NOT CARROTS! ohhhhkaaaaaay...? :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Y-e-e-e-e-s.... missed that window by quite a margin. So my sincere apologies einsteinians :)
Okay... here we go:
For the duration of Lizzie I's reign - potatoes were not a feature of court dining, despite Raleigh having presented her with whole plants of the things, and whilst it was alleged (in shows like Blackadder) that it was because they didn't know they could eat them, or considered them not to be food, it has also been alleged (on a history of the potato website - which went down about a week ago :/ and, annoyingly, has yet to return) that there may have been another reason.
Like the allegations that the potato reached the shores of Britain thanks to the Spanish, there is a compelling ring to this one too... so I chose it as my sort of historical event, even though it may be completely wrong. I hoped then that you wouldn't mind too much. Now... I don't care if you do :)
Anyway. Here's the case for the allegation:
What potatoes looked like during tudor times, compared to what we see in shops now, may have contributed to some confusion on first coming face to tuber with them in the palace kitchens. They certainly hadn't been welcomed on their arrival elsewhere in Europe either and what with Lizzie and her court of armed groupies accustomed to gorging on aesthetically pleasing food, to the extent that some of it would be ostentatiously gilded with gold and draped in peacock feathers and all manner of other pretty, dead things... and serving a queen as capricious as the one they were working for... a new vegetable that was not only vaguely leprous in appearance, but also decidedly brown... may have seemed a leap of faith too far for those who were kind of fond of balancing their heads on their necks and not sure how they might feed their family if it happened to fall off.
And so it came to pass that the only things missing from the potato dish served to the royal court on its debut, were the potatoes themselves... because they had been thrown away and only the green parts of the plant retained for cooking... which would have made the entire court exceedingly unwell due to the solanine in its above-the-ground bits.
And that could account for the potato not becoming a firm favourite at court and certainly would back up the allegation that the sort-of-historical event I was hoping I had given sufficient clues for, was that... for the remainder of Lizzie the wunth's time on the throne, potatoes were...
...yes :)
But that is all completely irrelevant!! :) Because David won on a countdown :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Brilliant Annnie. The missing vegetable - in Liz the Wunth's court! :-)
However I must state that this only reinforces my earlier claim that - furtive look plus hesitant glance - someone around here has a time machine ....
... as for carrots there is no need to eat them. It's a proven medical fact that you have the diverticulum next to the duodenal transverse gland ( just past the green gooey sludge extruder ) that makes diced carrot pieces anyway. All that guff about vitamins and what-not was a WWII gag that just wouldn't fade .....
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
But but but, carrots make you see better in the dark! Yes?
NO Rods and Cones do, they are parts of the eye. Carrots are vegetables and as such CAN provide needed vitamins and minerals to the eyes, and elsewhere in the body too, IF we don't get enough of them elsewhere in our diet. So no eating carrots will not normally make you "see better in the dark". There ARE some specific eye related medications that MAY help in certain circumstances, but eating carrots 'to see better in the dark' is an old wives tale to get kids to eat their veggies. Most people take a multi-vitamin now-a-days, it along with a normal regular diet provides more than enough for most people on a daily basis. Are there people who STILL need additional supplements, sure there are, but normal healthy people do just fine if they will just eat right and take a multi-vitamin once a day. Alot of what's in a multi-vitamin is 'water soluble', meaning we pee out what we don't need, but we keep what we do need. At the current daily cost of a multi-vitamin it is cheap insurance for those of us that don't eat right every day.
And that post has made you
And that post has made you the winner David. Well done. I'm off to visit my other half now... so if you don't mind waiting for my return... I will reveal what would have have won (I liked it so I italised it) if we hadn't reached the last three seconds of the potato's countdown to being the first vegetable in space... and I too will comment on all the posts sandwiched between yours and my previous one :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Hope you have good news
Hope you have good news Annie.
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
If what you were looking for
If what you were looking for was onions, then in all fairness I must reiterate that Mikey mentioned them first.
David
Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.
If what I was looking for WAS
If what I was looking for WAS onions :) then yes, I would have been very pleased to declare Mikey the winner :) however... you won by virtue of being post number 321, David - which is why I said:
If it had been pints of Guinness, or indeed pokers, robl would have won, which would have pleased me too :)
And it would have been exceedingly interesting to determine who might have won if it had been garlic. Mike, or Gary? Or the black death versus marshmallows and mulled ale :))) but it wasn't. It was you! :) That was a particularly delectable looking dish you posted earlier by the way. Of course, with your onerous duties requiring you to lord about TLPTP'ers at Seti, perhaps you would like to hand the crown over to someone else? :)
Whilst you mull that over...
If you cut AB at C with C, where would you put A? In the bin? (I went for a composting one here people - to be green - but its historical accuracy is extremely dubious as Elizabethans threw all their rubbish in the streets) Or in the pot?
Now... can anyone deduce what might have been the missing vegetable?* :) And what may have happened next? I haven't got my last picture quite ready yet... but hopefully I'll get it in before the edit window closes, or afterwards... to confirm anyone's too too late correct answer...
Thanks Chris :) I think I may need to find a suitable name for his beard :) He's never had one before and it is well...!!!! :)))))))
*and before anybody says anything... IT'S NOT CARROTS! ohhhhkaaaaaay...? :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Y-e-e-e-e-s.... missed that
Y-e-e-e-e-s.... missed that window by quite a margin. So my sincere apologies einsteinians :)
Okay... here we go:
For the duration of Lizzie I's reign - potatoes were not a feature of court dining, despite Raleigh having presented her with whole plants of the things, and whilst it was alleged (in shows like Blackadder) that it was because they didn't know they could eat them, or considered them not to be food, it has also been alleged (on a history of the potato website - which went down about a week ago :/ and, annoyingly, has yet to return) that there may have been another reason.
Like the allegations that the potato reached the shores of Britain thanks to the Spanish, there is a compelling ring to this one too... so I chose it as my sort of historical event, even though it may be completely wrong. I hoped then that you wouldn't mind too much. Now... I don't care if you do :)
Anyway. Here's the case for the allegation:
What potatoes looked like during tudor times, compared to what we see in shops now, may have contributed to some confusion on first coming face to tuber with them in the palace kitchens. They certainly hadn't been welcomed on their arrival elsewhere in Europe either and what with Lizzie and her court of armed groupies accustomed to gorging on aesthetically pleasing food, to the extent that some of it would be ostentatiously gilded with gold and draped in peacock feathers and all manner of other pretty, dead things... and serving a queen as capricious as the one they were working for... a new vegetable that was not only vaguely leprous in appearance, but also decidedly brown... may have seemed a leap of faith too far for those who were kind of fond of balancing their heads on their necks and not sure how they might feed their family if it happened to fall off.
And so it came to pass that the only things missing from the potato dish served to the royal court on its debut, were the potatoes themselves... because they had been thrown away and only the green parts of the plant retained for cooking... which would have made the entire court exceedingly unwell due to the solanine in its above-the-ground bits.
And that could account for the potato not becoming a firm favourite at court and certainly would back up the allegation that the sort-of-historical event I was hoping I had given sufficient clues for, was that... for the remainder of Lizzie the wunth's time on the throne, potatoes were...
...yes :)
But that is all completely irrelevant!! :) Because David won on a countdown :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Brilliant Annnie. The missing
Brilliant Annnie. The missing vegetable - in Liz the Wunth's court! :-)
However I must state that this only reinforces my earlier claim that - furtive look plus hesitant glance - someone around here has a time machine ....
... as for carrots there is no need to eat them. It's a proven medical fact that you have the diverticulum next to the duodenal transverse gland ( just past the green gooey sludge extruder ) that makes diced carrot pieces anyway. All that guff about vitamins and what-not was a WWII gag that just wouldn't fade .....
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
But but but, carrots make you
But but but, carrots make you see better in the dark! Yes?
I have an old passport with me with a droopy moustache looking like Frank Zappa!!!!
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
RE: But but but, carrots
David
Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.
RE: It is not fit for
It is not fit for human consumption I can assure you. Was my not quite sure dopey phase.
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
RE: But but but, carrots
NO Rods and Cones do, they are parts of the eye. Carrots are vegetables and as such CAN provide needed vitamins and minerals to the eyes, and elsewhere in the body too, IF we don't get enough of them elsewhere in our diet. So no eating carrots will not normally make you "see better in the dark". There ARE some specific eye related medications that MAY help in certain circumstances, but eating carrots 'to see better in the dark' is an old wives tale to get kids to eat their veggies. Most people take a multi-vitamin now-a-days, it along with a normal regular diet provides more than enough for most people on a daily basis. Are there people who STILL need additional supplements, sure there are, but normal healthy people do just fine if they will just eat right and take a multi-vitamin once a day. Alot of what's in a multi-vitamin is 'water soluble', meaning we pee out what we don't need, but we keep what we do need. At the current daily cost of a multi-vitamin it is cheap insurance for those of us that don't eat right every day.