I believe that E@H GPU workunits make heavy use of the GPU's double precision. Is this correct?
It looks like I may have a chance to replace one of my computers, using a GTX 560, with a newer computer using a GTX 980, although not very soon. Where can I find information comparing the double precision capability of these two graphics boards?
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
Graphics card performances
)
Probably better to ask in Cruncher's Corner than in the Cafe.
David
Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.
You might want to read this
)
You might want to read this thread
http://einsteinathome.org/node/197801&postid=134933
Einstein is single precision so double precision isn't as important.
The 560 is a double precision, the 980 is a single precision.
RE: You might want to read
)
I'll need to repeat the question at some other BOINC project, then. At least one of the BOINC projects my computers participate in makes heavy use of double precision, and I don't want to decrease my ability to participate in that one or those.
RE: I'll need to repeat the
)
The most widely cited "double precision required" project is MilkyWay@Home - where I see you've already posted.
Try this one .... Titan
)
Try this one ....
Titan
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
RE: RE: You might want to
)
I posted this link at MilkyWay:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#Compute_capability_table
It's a place to start at least.
RE: Try this one
)
If I had access to more power for the planned location of those computers, I might. I don't.
RE: RE: RE: You might
)
It helped enough. It shows that the GTX 980 can do double precision, and more than the GTX 560 can, but not as much more as some people would expect from the ratio of their single precision performances.